From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunziker v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
1:03-cv-06069-OWW-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)

Opinion

1:03-cv-06069-OWW-DLB-P.

February 16, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 66) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 46)


Plaintiff, Kory Hunziker ("plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 30, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 30, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed July 11, 2005, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hunziker v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
1:03-cv-06069-OWW-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Hunziker v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:KORY HUNZIKER, Plaintiff, v. D. ADAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

1:03-cv-06069-OWW-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)