Summary
explaining that this Court must construe insurance policy as whole and not in discrete units; declining to find ambiguity in policy definition of "you" referencing "named insured" on policy as opposed to actual claimant
Summary of this case from Erie Ins. Exch. v. KingOpinion
Argued April 9, 1992.
Decided May 14, 1992. Reargument Denied July 13, 1992.
Appeal No. 96 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991 from Order of Superior Court, 396 Pa. Super. 476, 578 A.2d 1312 (1990), entered July 30, 1990, at No. 1947 Philadelphia 1989, Affirming Order of Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, Civil Division, entered June 26, 1989, at No. 88-04370.
G. Eugene Beechwood, Jr., for appellant.
Richard C. Angino, for amicus — Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Ass'n.
J. Keath Fetter, for appellee.
James C. Haggerty, for amicus — Pennsylvania Defense Institute.
Before FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.
ORDER
Order affirmed.
NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
CAPPY, J., dissents.