From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huntington v. Dunn

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 25, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv680-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv680-MHT (WO)

11-25-2015

SAMUEL HUNTINGTON, also known as Samuel Huntington Bey (A.R.R.), Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER: JEFFERSON S. DUNN, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 5) is adopted.

(2) The plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (doc. no. 2) is denied.

(3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 25th day of November, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Huntington v. Dunn

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 25, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv680-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Huntington v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL HUNTINGTON, also known as Samuel Huntington Bey (A.R.R.)…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 25, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv680-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2015)