From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Trautwein

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 28, 2006
Civil No. 05-215-ST (D. Or. Nov. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-215-ST.

November 28, 2006

Darrick Lang Hunter, Portland, Oregon, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Agnes Sowle, Stephen Lewis Madkour, Multnomah County Attorney's Office, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Janice M. Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on October 4, 2006. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#64).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#39) is granted.


Summaries of

Hunter v. Trautwein

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 28, 2006
Civil No. 05-215-ST (D. Or. Nov. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Hunter v. Trautwein

Case Details

Full title:DARRICK LANG HUNTER, Plaintiff, v. ALAN TRAUTWEIN; JERRI JARMER; and LARRY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 28, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-215-ST (D. Or. Nov. 28, 2006)

Citing Cases

Ferry v. Doohan

To establish a claim for retaliation in the context of parole or post-prison supervision, a plaintiff must…

Ferry v. Doohan

Moreover, the government has a compelling interest in making sure the community is protected from pedophile…