From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Teledyne Wah Chang

Supreme Court of Oregon
Sep 29, 1988
306 Or. 659 (Or. 1988)

Opinion


761 P.2d 926 (Or. 1988) 306 Or. 659 In the Matter of the Compensation of Terry L. Hunter, Claimant. Terry L. HUNTER, Petitioner on Review, v. TELEDYNE WAH CHANG and Argonaut Insurance, Respondents on Review. WCB 84 -13275; CA A39205; SC S35474. Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc September 29, 1988

       James L. Edmunson and A. Sue Guthrie of Malagons&sMoore, Eugene, filed the petition on behalf of the petitioner on review.

       No appearance contra.

       Prior report: 91 Or.App. 374, 755 P.2d 146.

       MEMORANDUM OPINION.

       The petition for review is allowed. Because the Court of Appeals decided this case after the effective date of the 1987 amendment to ORS 656.236(2), that statute bars the cost award. Fromme v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 306 Or. 558, 761 P.2d 515 (1988). The order of the Court of Appeals allowing costs is reversed.


Summaries of

Hunter v. Teledyne Wah Chang

Supreme Court of Oregon
Sep 29, 1988
306 Or. 659 (Or. 1988)
Case details for

Hunter v. Teledyne Wah Chang

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Terry L. Hunter, Claimant. Terry L…

Court:Supreme Court of Oregon

Date published: Sep 29, 1988

Citations

306 Or. 659 (Or. 1988)
306 Or. 659

Citing Cases

Stelljes v. Maass

PER CURIAM MEMORANDUM OPINIONS, 306 Or. 659 (1988)MEMORANDUM OPINIONSSeptember 20, 1988( 760 P.2d…

Roseburg Forest Products v. McDonald

Employer argues that, even though claimant was found to be procedurally entitled to time loss, the award of…