Hunter v. State

Full title: Christopher HUNTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Apr 1, 2016

187 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D15–773.

04-01-2016

Christopher HUNTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Deana K. Marshall, of Law Office of Deana K. Marshall, Riverview, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Marjorie Vincent–Tripp and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Deana K. Marshall, of Law Office of Deana K. Marshall, Riverview, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Marjorie Vincent–Tripp and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the order summarily denying Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion does not include record attachments conclusively refuting Appellant's claim that wiretap orders were never signed. Upon remand, the trial court shall attach the correct records or address the claim on the merits. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(4). In all other respects, the order on appeal is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.