From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Hill

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 223 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Opinion

(Fall Riding, 1802.)

Bail must be proceeded against by sci. fa. and not by action of debt.

THIS was an action of debt against Hill, as bail of Ashe. Plea in abatement, that he should have been prosecuted by sci. fa. and not by an action of debt. Demurrer and joinder.


The act directs a sci. fa., and it must be followed — meaning the act of 1777, ch. 2, sec. 18.

Judgment for defendant.

NOTE. — See 1 Rev. Stat., ch. 10; Swepson v. Whitaker, 2 N.C. 224; Governor v. Jones, 9 N.C. 359; Barker v. Munroe, 15 N.C. 412; Tray v. Williamson, 18 N.C. 252.

Cited: Summers v. Parker, 4 N.C. 581, 583.

(224)


Summaries of

Hunter v. Hill

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 223 (N.C. Super. 1802)
Case details for

Hunter v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:HUNTER, ASSIGNEE, ETC., v. HILL

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1802

Citations

3 N.C. 223 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Citing Cases

Summers v. Parker

Debt will not lie on a bail bond in this State as the above act of Assembly mentions expressly that the bail…