Opinion
3:22-CV-00215-MMD-CSD
01-25-2023
NATALIE HUNTER, an individual; Plaintiff, v. HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO - LAKE TAHOE, a corporation; PARAGON GAMING, LLC, a limited liability company; NEVA ONE, LLC, a limited liability company; and DOES 1-20, inclusive; Defendants.
Anthony L. Martin Nevada Bar No. 8177 Elody C. Tignor Nevada Bar No. 15663 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Neva One, LLC dba Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe, and Paragon Gaming, LLC LAGSTEIN LAW FIRM, P.C. Eran Lagstein, Esq. Dominique Geller Nevada Bar No. 11969 Dominique Geller, LLC Attorney's for Plaintiff Natalie Hunter OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Elody C. Tignor Anthony L. Martin Attorneys for Defendants Neva One, LLC dba Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe, and Paragon Gaining, LLC
Anthony L. Martin Nevada Bar No. 8177 Elody C. Tignor Nevada Bar No. 15663 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Neva One, LLC dba Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe, and Paragon Gaming, LLC
LAGSTEIN LAW FIRM, P.C. Eran Lagstein, Esq. Dominique Geller Nevada Bar No. 11969 Dominique Geller, LLC Attorney's for Plaintiff Natalie Hunter
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Elody C. Tignor Anthony L. Martin Attorneys for Defendants Neva One, LLC dba Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe, and Paragon Gaining, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT PARAGON GAMING, LLC & THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE
Defendant Neva One, LLC dba Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe(“Hard Rock”), Defendant Paragon Gaming, LLC (“Paragon Gaming,” collectively, with Hard Rock, the “Defendants”), and Plaintiff Natalie Hunter (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE:
Plaintiff erroneously named Neva One, LLC and Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe as two separate defendants. The correct employer name is Neva One, LLC dba Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Lake Tahoe.
1. Defendant Paragon Gaming, LLC be dismissed from this action with prejudice with regard to all claims related to and asserted in this matter; and
2. Plaintiffs Third Cause of Action for Wrongfill Termination in Violation of Public Policy be dismissed with prejudice.
Each party is to bear their own fees and costs; however, nothing in this dismissal shall limit or constrain the right of either Plaintiff or Hard Rock, to recover attorney's fees or costs to the extent the law allows the same.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.