From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Easterling

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Aug 18, 2010
Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-302-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-302-ID (WO).

August 18, 2010


ORDER


This cause is now before the Court on Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal which contains a request for a certificate of appealability. (Doc. #11). The Plaintiff has also filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Doc. #12).

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a) provides that "[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." In making this determination as to good faith, a court must use an objective standard, such as whether the appeal is "frivolous," Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445, 82 S. Ct. 917, 921 (1962), or "has no substantive merit." United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 903, 102 S. Ct. 411 (1981); see also Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1122, 102 S. Ct. 2938 (1982); Morris v. Ross, 663 F.2d 1032 (11th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010, 102 S. Ct. 2303 (1982).

See Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc) (adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981).

The Plaintiff in this case has failed to point to any particular issue that he wishes to raise on appeal. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) and the Court's Order adopting the Recommendation (Doc. #9) and is unable to find a valid basis for appeal. Applying the "good faith" standard set forth above, the Court finds that the Plaintiff's appeal is without a legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in good faith. See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allan, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D. Fla. 1977), aff'd without opinion, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979).

Accordingly, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED

1. that the Plaintiff's request for a certificate of appealability (Doc. #11) be and the same is hereby DENIED;

2. that the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. #12) be and the same is hereby DENIED; and

3. that the Plaintiff's appeal be and the same is hereby CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a), as not taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Hunter v. Easterling

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Aug 18, 2010
Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-302-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Hunter v. Easterling

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR LEE HUNTER, #199 696, Plaintiff, v. EASTERLING, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 18, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-302-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Weeks v. U.S.

"In making this determination as to good faith, a court must use an objective standard, such as whether the…

Morrow v. United States

"In making this determination as to good faith, a court must use an objective standard, such as whether the…