From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Deutsche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 2008
56 A.D.3d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Summary

granting summary judgment on the claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on lack of evidence of bad faith

Summary of this case from Calico Cottage, Inc. v. TNB, Inc.

Opinion

No. 4497.

November 6, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about November 16, 2007, which, in actions arising out of defendant's refusal to pay bonuses, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaints, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Thompson Wigdor Gilly LLP, New York (Andrew S. Goodstadt of counsel), for appellants.

Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Cliff Fonstein of counsel), for respondent.

Gonzalez, J.P., McGuire, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.


Plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract lack merit in view of the unambiguous language of their contracts and the employee handbook plainly making bonus awards solely and completely a matter of defendant's discretion ( see Kaplan v Capital Co. of Am., 298 AD2d 110, 111, lv denied 99 NY2d 510; cf. Caruso v Allnet Communication Servs., 242 AD2d 484, 484-485). Language that bonuses would be contingent on criteria such as performance and profitability cannot be interpreted as a limitation on defendant's discretion, since doing so would render the clear language of discretion meaningless ( see Beal Sav. Bank v Sommer, 8 NY3d 318, 324). The claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, even assuming they can coexist in this context with a right of unfettered discretion ( but cf. Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 58 NY2d 293, 304-305 ), are not supported by any evidence of bad faith ( see Richbell Info. Servs. v Jupiter Partners, 309 AD2d 288, 303). The claims for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit are not viable since an express contract governs the subject matter ( see EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs Co., 5 NY3d 11, 23). Unpaid bonuses do not constitute "wages" under Labor Law § 193 ( see Truelove v Northeast Capital Advisory, 95 NY2d 220, 224), plaintiffs' "commission" nomenclature notwithstanding.

[ See 2007 NY Slip Op 33668(U).]


Summaries of

Hunter v. Deutsche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 2008
56 A.D.3d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

granting summary judgment on the claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on lack of evidence of bad faith

Summary of this case from Calico Cottage, Inc. v. TNB, Inc.

granting summary judgment on the claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on lack of evidence of bad faith

Summary of this case from Simon v. Unum Group

affirming summary judgment for defendant where written contracts governed the subject matter of plaintiff's entitlement to a bonus"

Summary of this case from Morgan Joseph Triartisan LLC v. Netlist, Inc.

In Hunter, the plaintiff-employee sued his employer, an investment bank, on the ground that he was wrongfully refused an annual bonus.

Summary of this case from MRC Re Holdings LLC v. Schreiber
Case details for

Hunter v. Deutsche

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN J. HUNTER, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8423
866 N.Y.S.2d 670

Citing Cases

Buckman v. Calyon Sec. (Usa) Inc.

93. Eternity Global Master Fund v. Morgan Guar. Trust Co., 375 F.3d 168, 177 (2d Cir.2004) (quotation marks…

Week Publ'ns, Inc. v. Hernandez

A discretionary bonus which is based on other factors other than an employee's part-performance does not…