From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Oct 27, 2022
3:21-cv-1229-HES-MCR (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-1229-HES-MCR

10-27-2022

MARILYN R. HUNT, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

Angela E. Rodante, Esq. Scott E. Damon, Esq. Charles J. Meltz, Esq. Laura Marie Kelly, Esq. Fred A. Cunningham, Esq.


Angela E. Rodante, Esq.

Scott E. Damon, Esq.

Charles J. Meltz, Esq.

Laura Marie Kelly, Esq.

Fred A. Cunningham, Esq.

ORDER

HARVEY S. SCHLESINGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 19) suggests James Lightfoot's Motion to Intervene should be denied. No objections have been filed. After an independent review of the record, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in full.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 19) is ADOPTED;
2. James Lightfoot's Motion to Intervene (Dkt. 15) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Hon. Judge Monte C. Richardson


Summaries of

Hunt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Oct 27, 2022
3:21-cv-1229-HES-MCR (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Hunt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN R. HUNT, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-1229-HES-MCR (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2022)