From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 26, 2004
No. 03-04-00343-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2004)

Opinion

No. 03-04-00343-CR

Filed: August 26, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Tom Green County, 119th Judicial District, No. B-01-0422-S, Honorable Curt F. Steib, Judge Presiding. Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PATTERSON and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Vernon Lee Hunt was convicted of felony driving while intoxicated and sentenced to fifteen years in prison. This conviction is final. In April 2004, Hunt filed his second pro se motion for judgment nunc pro tunc asserting that sentence was prematurely pronounced because the time for filing motion for new trial had not expired. He appeals from an order denying the motion. An appeal does not lie from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc. Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, pet. ref'd). The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Hunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 26, 2004
No. 03-04-00343-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2004)
Case details for

Hunt v. State

Case Details

Full title:VERNON LEE HUNT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 26, 2004

Citations

No. 03-04-00343-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2004)

Citing Cases

Medina v. State

As an initial matter, an appellant generally may only appeal from a final judgment, and an "appeal does not…