From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 4, 2013
2012-7039 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 4, 2013)

Opinion

2012-7039

04-04-2013

ANTHONY G. HUNT, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4707, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Anthony G. Hunt moves to supplement his brief with further points and authorities, which he also refers to as a motion for mandamus.

Mr. Hunt's motion provides additional arguments regarding the merits of his case. We deem it the best course to treat his motion as a supplement to his brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to supplement his brief is granted. A copy of Mr. Hunt's supplemental brief will be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case.

FOR THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s24


Summaries of

Hunt v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 4, 2013
2012-7039 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Hunt v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY G. HUNT, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

2012-7039 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 4, 2013)