From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Rand

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 12, 2012
461 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7158

01-12-2012

MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TONY RAND, Defendant - Appellee.

Michael Eugene Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03139-FL) Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Eugene Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Rand, No. 5:10-ct-03139-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2011). We deny Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hunt v. Rand

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 12, 2012
461 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Hunt v. Rand

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TONY RAND, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

461 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Perry v. Perry

10 et seq., but remained effective for prisoners convicted of crimes that occurred prior to the Structured…

Leak v. Butler

Moreover, North Carolina's parole statute does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. See Hunt v. Rand, No.…