From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Mirage Casino-Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued September 7, 1999

October 25, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.).


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens (see, CPLR 327; Islamic Republic of Iran v. Pahlavi, 62 N.Y.2d 474, cert denied 469 U.S. 1108 ; Barocas v. Gorenstein, 189 A.D.2d 847 ;O'Connor v. Bonanza Intl., 129 A.D.2d 569 ; Temple v. Temple, 97 A.D.2d 757 ).

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, RITTER, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hunt v. Mirage Casino-Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Hunt v. Mirage Casino-Hotel

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN HUNT, et al., respondents, v. MIRAGE CASINO-HOTEL, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 870