From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 4, 2005
No. 3:05-CV-0035-R (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2005)

Opinion

No. 3:05-CV-0035-R.

August 4, 2005


ORDER


After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that his motion to extend the time to pay the filing fee (Docket #6) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Pleading" (dated June 21, 2005) seeking to restore lost good-time credits and line classification in connection with three 2004 disciplinary actions is cognizable only in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The clerk shall MAIL to Plaintiff a blank habeas corpus form.

The Clerk shall transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Hunt v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 4, 2005
No. 3:05-CV-0035-R (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2005)
Case details for

Hunt v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:HENNESSEY HUNT, #619672, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 4, 2005

Citations

No. 3:05-CV-0035-R (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2005)