From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. BCCX

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jul 6, 2023
4:23-cv-013 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 6, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-cv-013

07-06-2023

MICHAEL HUNT, Plaintiff, v. BCCX, ARAMART FOOD SERVICES, TDOC, and SHAWN PHILLIPS, Defendants.


Susan K. Lee, Magistrate Judge

JUDGMENT ORDER

TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed herewith, this prisoner's pro se complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff is ASSESSED the filing fee of $402, and the custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit payments toward the filing fee in the manner set forth in the memorandum opinion. Also, the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of the memorandum opinion and this order to the custodian of inmate accounts at the Bledsoe County Correctional Complex and the Court's financial deputy.

Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hunt v. BCCX

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jul 6, 2023
4:23-cv-013 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Hunt v. BCCX

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HUNT, Plaintiff, v. BCCX, ARAMART FOOD SERVICES, TDOC, and SHAWN…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jul 6, 2023

Citations

4:23-cv-013 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 6, 2023)