From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jun 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-244-Y (N.D. Tex. Jun. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-244-Y

06-03-2013

CYNTHIA GALE HUNT v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On April 4, 2013, the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("the findings") in this case. In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying plaintiff Cynthia Gale Hunt's claims for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings on April 18, 2013.

After review, the Court concludes that the findings should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

____________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hunt v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jun 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-244-Y (N.D. Tex. Jun. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Hunt v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA GALE HUNT v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Jun 3, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-244-Y (N.D. Tex. Jun. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Winston v. Berryhill

She explicitly considered the medical findings and incorporated them into her RFC assessment, implicitly…

Adrienne W. v. Berryhill

"The ALJ is not required to discuss every piece of evidence in the record nor must the ALJ follow formalistic…