From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunnicutt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 3, 1934
66 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)

Opinion

No. 16191.

Delivered January 3, 1934.

Bill of Exception — Statement of Facts.

Bill of exception, based upon the fact that the argument complained of is "without support in the evidence," cannot be appraised without a statement of facts.

Appeal from the District Court of Upshur County. Tried below before the Hon. Walter G. Russell, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Leo Hart, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any statement of facts. Appellant's bill of exceptions No. 1 is based upon the fact that the argument complained of is "without support in the evidence," etc. Manifestly, we can not appraise such a bill of exceptions without a statement of facts. Bills of exception 2 and 3 were refused by the court.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hunnicutt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 3, 1934
66 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)
Case details for

Hunnicutt v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK HUNNICUTT v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 3, 1934

Citations

66 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)
125 Tex. Crim. 100

Citing Cases

Mathews v. State

To emphasize, substance, rather than mere form, controlled. Hunnicutt v. State, 125 Tex.Crim. R., 66 S.W.2d…