From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunnicutt v. Peters

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Mar 1, 2022
CV 20-206 MV/CG (D.N.M. Mar. 1, 2022)

Opinion

CV 20-206 MV/CG

03-01-2022

CARNELL HUNNICUTT, SR., Plaintiff, v. DANIEL PETERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Carnell Hunnicutt's Pro Se Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Objections to Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (the “Motion”), (Doc. 128), filed February 23, 2022; Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Objections to Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, (Doc. 130), and NMDOT Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, (Doc. 132), both filed February 28, 2022. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, the filings, and the relevant law, finds the Motion shall be GRANTED IN PART.

In the Motion, Mr. Hunnicutt requests “an additional two weeks” to submit his objections, which are currently due March 1, 2022, because of “the press of other business.” (Doc. 128 at 1). Defendants New Mexico Corrections Department, Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility, William Edgman, K.D. Miller, German Franco, Joshua Sigala, Ronald Martinez, and Jodi Upshaw do not oppose this Motion. (Doc. 132 at 2).

However, Defendants Summit Food Services, Astrid Castillo and Mary Williams do oppose the Motion, arguing that “[a]llowing [Mr. Hunnicutt] an extension of time to file his objections would be futile and unduly prejudicial to Defendants.” (Doc. 130 at 1).

They further contend that as Mr. Hunnicutt was transferred to the Guadalupe County Correctional Facility on December 21, 2021, his claims are now moot, “because [Mr. Hunnicutt] is only entitled to equitable relief under RLUIPA.” Id. at 2.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Mr. Hunnicutt's Pro Se Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Objections to Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, (Doc. 128) shall be GRANTED IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hunnicutt shall have until March 8, 2022, to file his objections to the February 15, 2022 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, (Doc. 126).

IT IS SO ORDERED .


Summaries of

Hunnicutt v. Peters

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Mar 1, 2022
CV 20-206 MV/CG (D.N.M. Mar. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Hunnicutt v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:CARNELL HUNNICUTT, SR., Plaintiff, v. DANIEL PETERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

CV 20-206 MV/CG (D.N.M. Mar. 1, 2022)