From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunley v. Glencore, Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Mar 29, 2012
No. 3:10-cv-455 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cv-455

03-29-2012

JEREMIAH HUNLEY, Plaintiff, v. GLENCORE, LTD., INC., EAST TENN. ZINC CO., LLC, TENNESSEE ZINC SERVS. CO., LLC, SANDVIK MINING & CONSTR. USA, LLC, SANDVIK MINING & CONSTR. OY, and DETROIT DIESEL CORP., Defendants.


(Phillips)


ORDER

I. Introduction

This matter is before the Court on the motions to dismiss filed by Defendant Sandvik Mining and Construction USA, LLC [Doc. 10]; Defendants East Tennessee Zinc Company, LLC and Tennessee Zinc Services Company, LLC [Doc. 20]; Defendant Detroit Diesel Corporation [Doc. 23]; Defendant Glencore Ltd., Inc. [Doc. 31]; and Defendant Sandvik Mining and Construction Oy [Doc. 34].

For the reasons contained in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motions filed by Defendants Sandvik Construction and Mining USA, LLC [Doc. 10], Sandvik Construction and Mining Oy, LLC [Doc. 34], and Detroit Diesel Corporation [Doc. 23] to dismiss Plaintiff's claims as barred by the applicable Tennessee statute of limitations are hereby GRANTED, and said defendants are DISMISSED from this action.

Defendant Tennessee Zinc Services Company, LLC and East Tennessee Zinc Company, LLC's motion to dismiss [Doc. 20] and Defendant Glencore Ltd., LLC's motion to dismiss [Doc. 31] are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART AS PREMATURE. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Tennessee Zinc Services as barred by the exclusivity provision of the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Act is GRANTED, and Tennessee Zinc Services is DISMISSED from this action. And as the Court finds the jurisdictional allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint insufficient to establish the Court's subject matter jurisdiction over this matter, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED without prejudice to Plaintiff's ability to file on or before April 16, 2012, an Amended Complaint against East Tennessee Zinc and Glencore, after which said Defendants may filed renewed motions to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hunley v. Glencore, Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Mar 29, 2012
No. 3:10-cv-455 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Hunley v. Glencore, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:JEREMIAH HUNLEY, Plaintiff, v. GLENCORE, LTD., INC., EAST TENN. ZINC CO.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-cv-455 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Atomo Coffee Inc. v. Marquart

The Ninth Circuit has not yet addressed whether this rule applies to the foreign equivalent of a limited…