From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HUND, JR. v. BEHRINGER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

May, 1916.


Judgment of Supreme Court and judgment of City Court reversed, with costs to appellant to abide event, and a new trial granted, to be had in the City Court on the 1st day of June, 1916, at 10 A.M. Held, that the weight of the evidence shows that the plaintiffs waived or estopped themselves from any claim of commissions. All concurred, except Kruse, P.J., and De Angelis, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance. (See Winans v. Jaques, 10 Daly, 487; Travis v. Bowron, 138 App. Div. 554.)


Summaries of

HUND, JR. v. BEHRINGER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

HUND, JR. v. BEHRINGER

Case Details

Full title:William Hund, Jr., and Another, Respondents, v. Louisa Behringer, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)