From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humphries v. Russo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 8, 2012
NO. 11-783-BAJ-CN (M.D. La. Mar. 8, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 11-783-BAJ-CN

03-08-2012

THOMAS HUMPHRIES (#494920) v. FRANK RUSSO, ETAL


CIVIL ACTION


RULING AND

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court, having carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland dated February 1, 2012 (doc. 4), and plaintiffs has objection thereto (doc. 5), hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs action is dismissed, with prejudice, as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March 8, 2012.

______________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Humphries v. Russo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 8, 2012
NO. 11-783-BAJ-CN (M.D. La. Mar. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Humphries v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS HUMPHRIES (#494920) v. FRANK RUSSO, ETAL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

NO. 11-783-BAJ-CN (M.D. La. Mar. 8, 2012)