From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humphreys v. Moriarty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 26, 1995
655 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-0339.

May 10, 1995. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1995.

Petition for writ of prohibition.

H. Mark Purdy of Purdy Flynn, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sylvie Perez Posner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hollywood, for respondent — The Honorable W. Herbert Moriarty.

Kenneth E. Zeilberger of Law Offices of Kaye Roger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent — Silver Thatch Atlantic Plaza Condominium Ass'n, Inc.


The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.


I would hold that the timeliness of the filing of this complaint for trial de novo under section 718.1255, Florida Statutes (1993), is governed by the Florida Administrative Code, Rule 61B-45.020 (1993), and that under the administrative rules this petition is not timely.

This rule was enacted after Taylor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners, 520 So.2d 557 (Fla. 1988), on which respondents rely.


Summaries of

Humphreys v. Moriarty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 26, 1995
655 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Humphreys v. Moriarty

Case Details

Full title:JOAN HUMPHREYS, PETITIONER, v. THE HON.W. HERBERT MORIARTY, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 26, 1995

Citations

655 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)