From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humphrey v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 29, 2005
No. CV F 01 5020 REC WMW P, Doc. 77 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2005)

Opinion

No. CV F 01 5020 REC WMW P, Doc. 77.

November 29, 2005


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 31, 2005, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 31, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Humphrey v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 29, 2005
No. CV F 01 5020 REC WMW P, Doc. 77 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Humphrey v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HUMPHREY, Plaintiff, v. C.R. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 29, 2005

Citations

No. CV F 01 5020 REC WMW P, Doc. 77 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2005)