From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huminski v. Town

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 5, 2004
111 F. App'x 643 (2d Cir. 2004)

Opinion

No. 03-7036.

November 5, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (J. Garvan Murtha, Judge).

Alan Uris, Law Office of Alan Uris, (Scott Huminski, on the brief) Bayside, NY, for Appellant, pro se.

James F. Carroll, English, Carroll Ritter, P.C., Middlebury, VT, for Appellee.

PRESENT: CARDAMONE, CABRANES and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.


UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.


SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment granting summary judgment for defendants.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that his federal and state constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws were violated because of various conflicts of interest in the prosecutor's office. For the reasons stated by the District Court in its Ruling on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of November 27, 2002, we hold that none of these challenges rise to the level of reversible error.

We have considered all of plaintiffs claims on appeal and found them to be without merit. We hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.


Summaries of

Huminski v. Town

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 5, 2004
111 F. App'x 643 (2d Cir. 2004)
Case details for

Huminski v. Town

Case Details

Full title:Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF BENNINGTON, VERMONT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 5, 2004

Citations

111 F. App'x 643 (2d Cir. 2004)