From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humes v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 9, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the plaintiff's complaint did not plead that the town had received prior written notice of the defect in the playground where he was injured, in accordance with the Town of Hempstead Code § 6-4, nevertheless the plaintiff did allege that the town had affirmatively created the defective condition, thus obviating the need for pleading or proving written notice (see, Haviland v Smith, 91 A.D.2d 764), and, under the circumstances, raising an issue of fact best resolved by a trial of the action. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Humes v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Humes v. Town of Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD HUMES, Individually and as Father and Natural Guardian of EDWARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 785

Citing Cases

Rosenthal v. Village of Quogue

The Village moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it had not received written notice of the…

Merchant v. Town of Halfmoon

This action was the subject of a prior appeal regarding the sufficiency of plaintiff's notice of claim (see,…