From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hume v. Bethea

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 25, 2016
197 So. 3d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–1563.

08-25-2016

Edward D. HUME, Appellant, v. Basil L. BETHEA, Jr., Realty House Commercial Properties, Inc., Basil L. Bethea, III, Sally C. Bethea, Mark G. Bethea, Appellees.

Edward D. Hume, pro se, Appellant. Larry H. Hipsh, III, Fort Walton Beach, for Appellees.


Edward D. Hume, pro se, Appellant.

Larry H. Hipsh, III, Fort Walton Beach, for Appellees.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) (explaining that a partial final judgment, other than one that disposes of the entire case as to a party, may be appealed prior to entry of the final judgment disposing of the entire case only if the partial final judgment “disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims”); Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220–21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal of partial final judgment because there was factual overlap between the claims dismissed by the trial court and the claims that remained pending).

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hume v. Bethea

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 25, 2016
197 So. 3d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Hume v. Bethea

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD D. HUME, Appellant, v. BASIL L. BETHEA, JR., REALTY HOUSE…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 25, 2016

Citations

197 So. 3d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)