From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humble Oil Refining Co. v. Male

U.S.
Oct 21, 1963
375 U.S. 43 (1963)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.

No. 326.

Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Summaries of

Humble Oil Refining Co. v. Male

U.S.
Oct 21, 1963
375 U.S. 43 (1963)
Case details for

Humble Oil Refining Co. v. Male

Case Details

Full title:HUMBLE OIL REFINING CO. ET AL. v . MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 21, 1963

Citations

375 U.S. 43 (1963)

Citing Cases

State v. Imperatore

07 et seq., the modern and preferred approach favors flexibility and liberality in assessing standards, while…

Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. Rodriguez

Id. 374-375, 521. [At 322-323.] While legislative delegation has far outrun the confines of Panama Refining…