From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Human v. GEICO Ins. Agency

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 8, 2022
2:21-cv-00166 (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00166

04-08-2022

BRYAN HUMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.. DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X inclusive Defendants. Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

LESLIE MARK STOVALL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 2566 ROSS MOYNIHAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11848 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARA L. MILLER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12618 Attorney for Defendant


LESLIE MARK STOVALL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 2566 ROSS MOYNIHAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11848 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LARA L. MILLER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12618 Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REBUTTAL EXPERT DEADLINE (THIRD REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 26-3 and FRCP 26, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, respectfully submit this stipulation for extension the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline by a period of seven days. Counsel for the parties have conferred regarding this matter and agree that an extension of discovery in this case is appropriate and necessary for litigation efficiency. The parties herein request an extension of the rebuttal expert disclosure deadlines by 7 days. The parties do not seek the extension or continuance of any other dates.

1. Discovery Completed to Date

At this time, all parties have exchanged initial and supplemental disclosures. The parties have propounded written discovery in the form of interrogatories, admissions, and requests for production of documents. The parties have engaged in deposition discovery and have exchanged initial expert disclosures.

2. Discovery That Remains to be Completed

The parties must exchange rebuttal expert disclosures, complete deposition discovery and generally complete remaining discovery and supplementation as needed.

3. Reasons Why Discovery Remaining Has Not Been Completed Within the Time Limits of the Court's Prior Order

The request to extend the rebuttal expert disclosure was made by plaintiff who has a retained expert whose key employee suffered an illness requiring absence from work causing the expert to devote more time than usual to his clinic and delayed work on rebuttal reporting. The Defendant agrees to the extension provided that the extension is mutual and applies also to Defendant's experts, to which the plaintiff agrees.

4. Proposed Schedule for Completion of Outstanding Discovery

The parties respectfully propose the following discovery deadlines:

Event

Current Deadline

Proposed Deadline

Last day to add parties or amend pleadings

CLOSED

CLOSED

Initial Expert Disclosures

March 8, 2022

CLOSED

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures

April 8, 2022

April 15, 2022

Close of Discovery

May 6, 2022

(Unchanged)

Dispositive Motions Deadline

June 6, 2022

(Unchanged)

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the stipulation to extend rebuttal expert deadlines in this matter, is hereby ordered that the stipulation is approved. The proposed deadlines set forth under paragraph 4 of the stipulation shall govern future discovery in this case. A separate Order shall not be issued.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2022.


Summaries of

Human v. GEICO Ins. Agency

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 8, 2022
2:21-cv-00166 (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Human v. GEICO Ins. Agency

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN HUMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 8, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00166 (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2022)