From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Human Adventure Corp. v. Williams

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 2, 2022
22-cv-4588 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-4588 (VSB)

09-02-2022

HUMAN ADVENTURE CORPORATION AND MARCO AIOLFI, Plaintiffs, v. LAMARTINIQUE WILLIAMS, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On August 31, 2022, I held a telephonic conference regarding Plaintiffs' order to show cause. (Doc. 15.) Defendant appeared telephonically for the conference. It is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment is denied without prejudice and may be re-issued if Defendant fails to file a timely answer to the Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant file an answer to the Complaint by October 3, 2022.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Defendant intends to retain counsel, any notice of appearance must be filed by October 3, 2022. For more information on proceeding pro se in this District, Defendant should visit this webpage: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/prose?clinic= or contact the NYLAG Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants at 212-659-6190.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Human Adventure Corp. v. Williams

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 2, 2022
22-cv-4588 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Human Adventure Corp. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:HUMAN ADVENTURE CORPORATION AND MARCO AIOLFI, Plaintiffs, v. LAMARTINIQUE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2022

Citations

22-cv-4588 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2022)