From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Human Adventure Corp. v. Williams

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
22-CV-4588 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-4588 (VSB)

07-11-2022

HUMAN ADVENTURE CORP. and MARCO AIOLFI, Plaintiffs, v. LAMARTINIQUE WILLIAMS, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiffs filed this action on June 2, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On June 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an affidavit of service stating that Defendant was served personally on June 13, 2022. (Doc. 7.) Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' complaint was thus due on July 5, 2022. (See id.) Defendant has yet to appear in this action. Plaintiffs, however, have taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, Plaintiffs must seek default judgment in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than August 1, 2022. If Plaintiffs fail to do so or otherwise demonstrates that they do not intend to prosecute, I will dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Human Adventure Corp. v. Williams

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
22-CV-4588 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Human Adventure Corp. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:HUMAN ADVENTURE CORP. and MARCO AIOLFI, Plaintiffs, v. LAMARTINIQUE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

22-CV-4588 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)