From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hulsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville
Sep 30, 1997
C.C.A. No. 01C01-9609-CC-00399 (Tenn. Crim. App. Sep. 30, 1997)

Opinion

C.C.A. No. 01C01-9609-CC-00399.

September 30, 1997.

Lincoln County, Honorable Charles Lee, Judge, (Post Conviction).

AFFIRMED — RULE 20

FOR THE APPELLANT:

HERSHELL D. KOGER, Attorney at Law.

FOR THE APPELLEE:

JOHN KNOX WALKUP, Attorney General Reporter, EUGENE J. HONEA, Assistant Attorney General, MICHAEL W. McCOWN, District Attorney General, WEAKLEY E. BARNARD, Assistant District Attorney General.


OPINION

The petitioner, Ricky D. Hulsey, appeals the Lincoln County Circuit Court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner was sentenced to a five year incarcerative term following his guilty pleas to the offenses of aggravated assault and vandalism. After the petitioner filed his post-conviction petition, the lower court appointed counsel, conducted a hearing, and denied the requested relief in a well-drafted order setting forth the detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the petitioner challenges the lower court's determinations he did not enter his guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily and that he received the effective assistance of counsel. Having reviewed the record, we affirm the judgment of the lower court pursuant to Rule 20 of the rules of this court.

In a post-conviction proceeding filed after May 10, 1995, the petitioner has the burden of establishing his claims by clear and convincing evidence. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-210(f) (Supp. 1996). A trial court's findings of fact following a post-conviction hearing have the weight of a jury verdict. Bratton v. State, 477 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tenn.Crim.App. 1971). On appeal, those findings are conclusive unless the evidence preponderates against the judgment. Butler v. State, 789 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tenn. 1990).

In the case at bar, the lower court found that the petitioner failed to carry his burden of proving his allegations. In this court, he has likewise failed to establish that the evidence preponderates against the lower court's findings. As a result, we find no error of law requiring reversal. The lower court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Court of Criminal Appeals Rules.

_______________________________ CURWOOD WITT, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_______________________________ JOE G. RILEY JR., JUDGE

_______________________________ WALKER, SPECIAL JUDGE

NOTE: NEED JUDGE WALKER'S FULL NAME


Summaries of

Hulsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville
Sep 30, 1997
C.C.A. No. 01C01-9609-CC-00399 (Tenn. Crim. App. Sep. 30, 1997)
Case details for

Hulsey v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY D. HULSEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

C.C.A. No. 01C01-9609-CC-00399 (Tenn. Crim. App. Sep. 30, 1997)