From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hullihen v. Klee

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 15, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-1051 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 15, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-1051

09-15-2016

BLAKE DANIEL HULLIHEN, Petitioner, v. PAUL KLEE, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Opinion entered this day:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases for lack of exhaustion of available state-court remedies. Dated: September 15, 2016

/s/ Paul L. Maloney

Paul L. Maloney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hullihen v. Klee

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 15, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-1051 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Hullihen v. Klee

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE DANIEL HULLIHEN, Petitioner, v. PAUL KLEE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 15, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-1051 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 15, 2016)