This is true even if the erroneous instruction deals with elements of the crime. See, e.g., Hull v. State, 350 So.2d 60 (Miss. 1977). It is clear, however, that under Rule 42 this Court may raise an objection to a jury instruction in order to prevent manifest injustice. In Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798 (Miss.
1981); Moss v. State, 386 So.2d 1129 (Miss. 1980); Hull v. State, 350 So.2d 60 (1977). The same reasoning applies here.
1981); Moss v. State, 386 So.2d 1129 (Miss. 1980); Hull v. State, 350 So.2d 60 (Miss. 1977). However, we do not reach this line of cases because we are of the opinion there was evidence to support the murder instruction.
1980), Ray v. State, 381 So.2d 1032 (Miss. 1980), Hull v. State, 350 So.2d 60 (Miss. 1977), King v. State, 315 So.2d 925 (Miss. 1975).