From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hull v. Miller

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 26, 2021
LA CV21-04358 JAK (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2021)

Opinion

LA CV21-04358 JAK (ADSx)

10-26-2021

Ed Hull v. Decedents Estate of Duane F. Miller, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE KEITH R. KIEFER

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than November 2, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses, as to Kenny R. Kiefer. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hull v. Miller

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 26, 2021
LA CV21-04358 JAK (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Hull v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:Ed Hull v. Decedents Estate of Duane F. Miller, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

LA CV21-04358 JAK (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2021)