Opinion
17–986
07-11-2018
Nicholas HULIN, et al. v. MULTI–CHEM GROUP, LLC, et al.
Richard G. Duplantier, Jr., Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, 701 Poydras Street, Suite 4040, New Orleans, LA 70139, (504) 525–6802, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS: Multi–Chem Group, LLC, Cade Bourque, John Gauthier, Nathan Walker, Aaron Gauthier Derriel Carlton McCorvey, 102 Versailles Boulevard, Suite 620, Lafayette, LA 70501, (337) 291–2431, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES: Nicholas Hulin, et al.
Richard G. Duplantier, Jr., Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, 701 Poydras Street, Suite 4040, New Orleans, LA 70139, (504) 525–6802, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS: Multi–Chem Group, LLC, Cade Bourque, John Gauthier, Nathan Walker, Aaron Gauthier
Derriel Carlton McCorvey, 102 Versailles Boulevard, Suite 620, Lafayette, LA 70501, (337) 291–2431, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES: Nicholas Hulin, et al.
Court composed of Marc T. Amy, Van H. Kyzar, and Candyce G. Perret, Judges.
AMY, Judge.For the reasons provided in the consolidated appeal of Robert J. Broussard, et al. v. Multi–Chem Group, LLC , 17–985 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/11/18), ––– So.3d ––––, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this proceeding are assessed to the defendants-appellants, Multi–Chem Group, LLC, Cade Bourque, John Gauthier, Nathan Walker, and Aaron Gauthier.