Opinion
2:09-cv-0109 6-ECR-RJJ
10-19-2011
MINUTES OF THE COURT
PRESENT: EDWARD C. REED , JR. U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Deputy Clerk: COLLEEN LARSEN Reporter: NONE APPEARING
Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING
Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS
Prior to this Court's order (#116) denying Plaintiff's motion (#101) to amend summary judgment, Plaintiff filed a motion (#110) for clarification on August 29, 2011. In her motion (#110) for clarification, Plaintiff briefly references the arguments that Plaintiff presented in full in her motion (#101) to amend summary judgment. The Court therefore finds that the issues presented in Plaintiff's motion (#110) for clarification have been resolved by the Court's October 6, 2011 order (#116) denying Plaintiff's motion (#101) to amend summary judgment. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion (#110) for clarification will be denied as moot.
IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (#110) for clarification is DENIED as moot.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By Deputy Clerk