From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hukman v. Terrible Herbst Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 19, 2022
2:21-cv-01279-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01279-APG-VCF

08-19-2022

Sheida Hukman, Plaintiff, v. Terrible Herbst Inc., Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, SHEIDA HUKMAN Pro Se Plaintiff ROGER L. GRANDGENETT II, ESQ. STEVEN K.T. WASHINGTON, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant TERRIBLE HERBST INC.


Respectfully submitted,

SHEIDA HUKMAN

Pro Se Plaintiff

ROGER L. GRANDGENETT II, ESQ.

STEVEN K.T. WASHINGTON, ESQ.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

TERRIBLE HERBST INC.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 49]

Plaintiff Sheida Hukman (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Terrible Herbst Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue the date for the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery presently scheduled for August 22, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. A continuance is requested because Plaintiff is unable to attend the current hearing date due to an important business commitment. The parties propose that the hearing be continued to either September 12, 13, or 14, or any date which adheres to the Court's schedule.

This extension is sought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hukman v. Terrible Herbst Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 19, 2022
2:21-cv-01279-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Hukman v. Terrible Herbst Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Sheida Hukman, Plaintiff, v. Terrible Herbst Inc., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 19, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01279-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2022)