Opinion
No. 119626.
February 4, 2002.
COA: 233698, Kent CC: 00-011254-NF.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the June 18, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals and direct that court to provide a further explanation of its order of June 18, 2001, specifically stating the standards of review used and further explaining the Court's conclusion that the trial court erred in finding that defendant showed good cause. See Alken-Ziegler v Waterbury Headers Corporation, 461 Mich. 219 (1999). On remand, the Court of Appeals may, in its discretion, reconsider its order.
We do not retain jurisdiction.