From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hugyecz v. 99 Commercial Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 4, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to offer a justifiable excuse for its default in this case. Thus, its motion to vacate the judgment entered on its default was properly denied (see, Fidelity Deposit Co. v Andersen Co., 60 N.Y.2d 693, 695). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hugyecz v. 99 Commercial Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Hugyecz v. 99 Commercial Street, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HUGYECZ, Respondent, v. 99 COMMERCIAL STREET, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Odunsi

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the…

American Home Assurance Company v. Choudary

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the properly-executed affidavit of service raised a presumption…