From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hugueley v. Dresden Tennessee Police Department

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Mar 29, 2006
No. 01-05-1348-TAN (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2006)

Opinion

No. 01-05-1348-TAN.

March 29, 2006


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS', CLAY ANDERSON, WILLIAM LOFLIN, AND JASON PEARCY'S, MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER


This matter came before this Honorable Court pursuant to a Motion and Memorandum in Support of a Motion to Strike the Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Answer.

Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Answer was filed in noncompliance with Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which requires that any party desiring to amend or otherwise supplement his/her pleading must request permission from the Court in a properly filed Motion for Leave before filing said supplemental pleading; and., IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER BE STRICKEN from the Record.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Hugueley v. Dresden Tennessee Police Department

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Mar 29, 2006
No. 01-05-1348-TAN (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Hugueley v. Dresden Tennessee Police Department

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE HUGUELEY and CONNIE HUGUELEY, Plaintiffs, v. DRESDEN TENNESSEE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 29, 2006

Citations

No. 01-05-1348-TAN (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2006)