And considering the overwhelming evidence establishing Petitioner committed the offense, Petitioner has not shown a reasonable probability that without the jury seeing his leg restraint, it would not have found him guilty. See, e.g., Hughlon v. Florida, No. 21-14001, 2022 WL 17494866, at *4 (11th Cir. 2022) (explaining “the petitioner was required to show a reasonable probability that, without being visibly shack[l]ed, the jury would not have convicted him and [ ] he [ ] failed to meet that standard because the evidence against him was ‘overwhelming'”)