From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 23, 2009
No. CV 08-2225-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV 08-2225-PHX-JAT.

September 23, 2009


ORDER


On December 12, 2008, this Court screened Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and found the complaint did not meet the pleading standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by January 23, 2009, or his case would be dismissed pursuant to both 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (failure to comply with a court order). Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint and, accordingly, the Court dismissed this case without prejudice on February 6, 2009.

In June 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 11) and a Motion to Appoint Special Advocate (Doc. # 12). Plaintiff did not move for reconsideration of the Court's February 6 Order dismissing Plaintiff's action. Rather, Plaintiff simply re-filed a motion for a temporary restraining order. This case having been dismissed for the reasons stated in the Court's February 6 Order, and the Clerk of the Court having already closed this case,

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 11) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Special Advocate (Doc. # 12) is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Hughes v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 23, 2009
No. CV 08-2225-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Hughes v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Mark Edward Hughes, Plaintiff, v. United States of America; et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Sep 23, 2009

Citations

No. CV 08-2225-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2009)