From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Sep 16, 2021
2:21-cv-1139-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1139-BJR

09-16-2021

FRANKLIN HUGHES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant.

Steve Y. Koh, WSBA No. 23284 Kathleen M. O'Sullivan, WSBA No. 27850 Lauren J. Tsuji, WSBA No. 55839 PERKINS COIE LLP Kristine McAlister Brown (pro hac vice forthcoming) ALSTON & BIRD LLP Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. Beth E. Terrell, WSBA No. 26759 TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC Bryan L. Bleichner CHESNUT CAMBRONNE PA Justin C. Walker MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated


Steve Y. Koh, WSBA No. 23284

Kathleen M. O'Sullivan, WSBA No. 27850

Lauren J. Tsuji, WSBA No. 55839

PERKINS COIE LLP

Kristine McAlister Brown (pro hac vice forthcoming)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Beth E. Terrell, WSBA No. 26759

TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC

Bryan L. Bleichner

CHESNUT CAMBRONNE PA

Justin C. Walker MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Under Western District of Washington Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), Plaintiff Franklin Hughes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“Defendant”), together (“the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action is extended for a total of 30 days to October 20, 2021.

Good cause exists for this extension, as there is a pending motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) regarding transfer and coordination or consolidation of related cases for pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, filed on August 23, 2021. See In re T-Mobile, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation., MDL Docket No. 3019 (ECF No. 1). The plaintiffs in a related case filed the transfer motion, and this case has been noticed to the JPML based on its similar nature. Id. (ECF Nos. 1, 8). The Parties agree to this extension in order to conserve judicial resources and the resources of the Parties in addressing multiple related class actions.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hughes v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Sep 16, 2021
2:21-cv-1139-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Hughes v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN HUGHES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1139-BJR (W.D. Wash. Sep. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Schupler v. T-Mobile U.S. Inc.

Moreover, pursuant to stipulated motions, this Court recently stayed seven cases pending the JPML's ruling…

Brackman v. T-Mobile U.S., Inc.

And like most courts, this Court recently stayed six cases pending the JPML's ruling on a motion to transfer.…