From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 31, 2022
No. 1D21-3853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

1D21-3853

08-31-2022

Steven Franklin Hughes, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Steven Franklin Hughes, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. R. Anthony Salem, Judge.

Steven Franklin Hughes, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. Appellant is warned that further frivolous filings in this Court may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition on further pro se filings in this Court. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2022); State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999) ("[A]ny citizen, including a citizen attacking his or her conviction, abuses the right to pro se access by filing repetitious and frivolous pleadings, thereby diminishing the ability of the courts to devote their finite resources to the consideration of legitimate claims.").

B.L. Thomas, Bilbrey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hughes v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 31, 2022
No. 1D21-3853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Hughes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven Franklin Hughes, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

No. 1D21-3853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2022)