From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. State

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 6, 2013
2:13-cv-1764 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)

Opinion


TIMOTHY WAYNE HUGHES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents. No. 2:13-cv-1764 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 6, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Hughes v. State

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 6, 2013
2:13-cv-1764 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Hughes v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WAYNE HUGHES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 6, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-1764 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)