From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 29, 2018
547 S.W.3d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80547

05-29-2018

Thadius HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Keith O’Connor, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Keith O’Connor, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Thadius Hughes appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Hughes alleges that his conviction for two counts of first-degree assault and two counts of armed criminal action should be vacated because his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hughes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 29, 2018
547 S.W.3d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Hughes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thadius HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 29, 2018

Citations

547 S.W.3d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)