Opinion
Nos. 05-03-00586-CR, 05-03-00587-CR
Opinion Filed September 27, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F03-48230-RN, F03-40251-N. Affirmed.
Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and FITZGERALD.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
John Pierre Hughes entered a negotiated guilty plea to credit card abuse. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court deferred adjudication of appellant's guilt, placed him on community supervision for two years, and assessed a $750 fine. Three days later, appellant was arrested for burglary of a building. During a joint adjudication and plea hearing, appellant entered a guilty plea to the new burglary charge and a plea of true to the State's allegation that he had violated a condition of community supervision by committing the burglary. The trial court accepted appellant's pleas, adjudicated him guilty of both offenses, and assessed punishment for each offense at two years confinement in a state jail facility. In the burglary case, the trial court also assessed a $10,000 fine. Appellant appeals both convictions. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.