From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Schnurr

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Oct 25, 2021
No. 21-3222-SAC (D. Kan. Oct. 25, 2021)

Opinion

21-3222-SAC

10-25-2021

CHARLEY JAMES HUGHES, JR., Plaintiff, v. DAN SCHNURR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

SAM A. CROW, U.S. SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is a civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 22, 2021, the court directed plaintiff to submit the filing fee on or before October 22, 2021. There has been no response.

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “authorizes a district court, upon a defendant's motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or ‘a court order.'” Young v. U.S., 316 Fed.Appx. 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)). “This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met.” Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). “In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b).” Young, 316 Fed.Appx. at 771-72 (citations omitted).

Because plaintiff has failed to submit the filing fee as directed, the court will dismiss this matter without prejudice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED this matter is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Schnurr

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Oct 25, 2021
No. 21-3222-SAC (D. Kan. Oct. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Hughes v. Schnurr

Case Details

Full title:CHARLEY JAMES HUGHES, JR., Plaintiff, v. DAN SCHNURR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Oct 25, 2021

Citations

No. 21-3222-SAC (D. Kan. Oct. 25, 2021)